Design capacity bottleneck: outsource or wait?

When projects stall because design capacity is missing: how to quantify the cost of waiting and which engineering tasks are well suited to outsourcing.

· 1 min read · Author: Gerald Vogt

Capacity bottlenecks in design are rarely permanent, but almost always expensive. The reflex to wait until the in-house team frees up looks cheap because the cost of waiting is never booked anywhere.

Quantify the cost of waiting

Delayed tooling pushes series starts, blocks press capacity and ties up project participants for longer. Quantifying these effects roughly gives you a solid basis for the decision instead of a gut feeling.

What outsources well

Clearly delimited packages: a complete die design, a strip layout, a fixture family, or drawing derivation including the bill of materials. The clearer the interface, the lower the coordination effort.

What is better kept in-house

Tasks with high change frequency and constant coordination with production or the customer are often more efficient internally. The same applies to designs tightly coupled to internal product know-how, unless an NDA-based working model is established.

Hand over cleanly

A smooth start usually requires part data, target machine, tolerance requirements, standard parts catalogue and one contact with decision authority. After that, we can normally say within one or two working days when the package can be scheduled.

Process Optimisation & Project Management

View services

Describe your part, get a straight answer

Send us the part, the annual volume and your timeframe. We come back with a realistic view on feasibility, tooling concept and effort. No passing through several departments.